Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Smith results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 65% saturation with 58.541 hits. Analysis detected 478.062 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,313 of 28,364 speakers). This Olivia Smith is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Olivia Smith
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.0% percentile
24.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 65.0%65.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 42.9%42.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 33.4%33.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 65.0%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 42.9%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 33.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos