Speaker summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos448.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia McDowell results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 67.9% saturation with 346.09 hits. Analysis detected 933.09 faulty-reasoning hits from 448.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (17,489 of 26,836 speakers). This Olivia McDowell is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Olivia McDowell
Speaker details
Total words: 448.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
21.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos448.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 67.9%67.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.9%32.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 67.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos