Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video470.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Cazes results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 925.234 faulty-reasoning hits from 470.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,108 of 28,364 speakers). This Olivia Cazes is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Olivia Cazes
Speaker details
Total words: 470.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos470.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.9%15.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.1%2.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos