Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oli Mould results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 669.201 faulty-reasoning hits from 268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,940 of 28,364 speakers). This Oli Mould is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Oli Mould
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 268
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos268 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Begging the Question: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos