Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oleksandr Vilkul results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 43.875 hits. Analysis detected 82.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,771 of 28,364 speakers). This Oleksandr Vilkul is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Oleksandr Vilkul
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos