Speaker summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ola results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 86.8% saturation with 46 hits . Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,600 of 28,364 speakers). This Ola is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Ola
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Video count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 46.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 86.8% 86.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 86.8% 86.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 49.1% 49.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 49.1% 49.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 37.7% 37.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 37.7% 37.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Negativity Bias: Speaker 86.8%, sitewide 19.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 86.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst