Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Okello Chatrie results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 64.4% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 348 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,494 of 28,364 speakers). This Okello Chatrie is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Okello Chatrie
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
64.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 64.4%64.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 64.4%64.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos