Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Okasio Cortez results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,062 of 28,364 speakers). This Okasio Cortez is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Okasio Cortez
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 51.3%51.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 48.7%48.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 51.3%51.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.7%48.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 51.3%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 51.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.7%, sitewide 15.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 48.7%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos