Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil & Gas Journal results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 210 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,161 of 28,364 speakers). This Oil & Gas Journal is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Oil & Gas Journal
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos