Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ohio Senate results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,160 of 28,364 speakers). This Ohio Senate is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Ohio Senate
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 20
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos20 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos