Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oficina del Inspector General del USDA results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,158 of 28,364 speakers). This Oficina del Inspector General del USDA is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Oficina del Inspector General del USDA
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos