Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Office of Protective Operations results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 42 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,142 of 28,364 speakers). This Office of Protective Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Office of Protective Operations
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos21 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos