Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Objective-See results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,130 of 28,364 speakers). This Objective-See is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Objective-See
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos