Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video11 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakmont results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 11 faulty-reasoning hits from 11 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,126 of 28,364 speakers). This Oakmont is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Oakmont
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 11
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos11 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos