Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyah Berg results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61.5% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 390.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,420 of 28,364 speakers). This Nyah Berg is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Nyah Berg
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
28.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos116 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 33.3%33.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.1%39.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos