Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norwalk police results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 60.8% saturation with 41.366 hits. Analysis detected 182.485 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,958 of 28,364 speakers). This Norwalk police is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Norwalk police
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
35.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 60.8%60.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 36.1%36.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.5%35.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 60.8%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos