Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video87.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norton results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Status Quo Bias, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 87.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,995 of 28,364 speakers). This Norton is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Norton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 87.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.5% percentile
15.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos87.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.1%21.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos