Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norman Wong results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 748.455 faulty-reasoning hits from 416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,872 of 28,364 speakers). This Norman Wong is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Norman Wong
Speaker details
Total words: 416
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
6.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos416 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos