Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NORAD results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 166 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,146 of 28,364 speakers). This NORAD is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
NORAD
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.3% percentile
10.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos