Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nobel Barakat results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 85.8% saturation with 56.625 hits. Analysis detected 100.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,021 of 28,364 speakers). This Nobel Barakat is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Nobel Barakat
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
67.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 85.8%85.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 85.8%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos