Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Law results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Begging the Question, with Special Pleading as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,260 of 28,364 speakers). This Noah Law is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Noah Law
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Special Pleading: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Special PleadingSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos