Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These No.1 Prosecution Inquest Committee results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (3,070 of 28,364 speakers). This No.1 Prosecution Inquest Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
No.1 Prosecution Inquest Committee
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510089.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos