Speaker summary
⁠67%3 analyzed articles/videos209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nika Soon-Shiong results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 819.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 209 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,644 of 28,364 speakers). This Nika Soon-Shiong is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Nika Soon-Shiong
Speaker details
Total words: 209
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
15.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos209 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.9%19.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos