Speaker summary
⁠36%2 analyzed articles/videos51.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nielsen results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71.9% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 123 faulty-reasoning hits from 51.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 71.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,744 of 28,364 speakers). This Nielsen is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Nielsen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 51.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
71.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos51.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 71.9%71.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 71.9%71.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 71.9%71.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos