Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video209.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Byers results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Slippery Slope, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 418.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 209.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,881 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicole Byers is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Nicole Byers
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 209.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
15.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos209.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.0%17.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos