Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video2,290 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicolas Winding Refn results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 1,028.291 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,290 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (28,350 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicolas Winding Refn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nicolas Winding Refn
Speaker details
Total words: 2,290
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos