Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicolas Leo Charbonneau results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 80.4% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 266 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,140 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicolas Leo Charbonneau is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Nicolas Leo Charbonneau
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
43.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 80.4%80.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 80.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos