Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video139.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Wilson results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 83.1% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 505.214 faulty-reasoning hits from 139.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,066 of 26,155 speakers). This Nick Wilson is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Nick Wilson
Speaker details
Total words: 139.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
45.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos139.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 83.2%83.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 66.3%66.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.4%26.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 83.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 66.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos