Speaker summary
39%2 analyzed articles/videos378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Cleary results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 457.085 faulty-reasoning hits from 378 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,067 of 27,710 speakers). This Nick Cleary is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Nick Cleary
Speaker details
Total words: 378
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos378 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate