Speaker summary
39% 2 analyzed articles/videos 378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Cleary results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 46 hits . Analysis detected 457.085 faulty-reasoning hits from 378 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,067 of 27,710 speakers). This Nick Cleary is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Nick Cleary
Speaker details
Total words: 378
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos378 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst