Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Hite results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 46.125 hits. Analysis detected 384.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,270 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicholas Hite is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Nicholas Hite
Speaker details
Total words: 61.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.4% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos