Speaker summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Heras results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 118 hits . Analysis detected 691.907 faulty-reasoning hits from 251 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,078 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicholas Heras is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Nicholas Heras
Speaker details
Total words: 251
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.7% percentile 20.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos251 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 31.7% 31.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 28.8% 28.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 29.5% 29.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 38.1% 38.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 24.5% 24.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 26.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst