Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Freudenberg results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 79.1% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 222 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,077 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicholas Freudenberg is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Nicholas Freudenberg
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
51.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 79.1%79.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 41.9%41.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 79.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos