Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Rep. results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (3,033 of 28,364 speakers). This New York Rep. is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
New York Rep.
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

89% percentile
025507510089.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos