Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Police Department (NYPD) results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 121 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,367 of 28,364 speakers). This New York City Police Department (NYPD) is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
New York City Police Department (NYPD)
Speaker details
Total words: 77
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
31.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos77 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos