Speaker summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Scientist CoLab results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,182 of 28,364 speakers). This New Scientist CoLab is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
New Scientist CoLab
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
50.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.7%51.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.9%25.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 25.9%25.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos