Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Republic results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 264 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,256 of 28,364 speakers). This New Republic is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
New Republic
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos