Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video102.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Tinmouth results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 59.508 hits. Analysis detected 325.139 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,924 of 28,364 speakers). This Neil Tinmouth is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Neil Tinmouth
Speaker details
Total words: 102.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
32.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 57.2%57.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 40.3%40.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 26.4%26.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.8%21.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 57.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 40.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos