Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Floyd results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 447.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,097 of 28,364 speakers). This Neil Floyd is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Neil Floyd
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
32.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos114 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.8%61.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 63.8%63.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 52.6%52.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 63.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos