Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neate-Clegg results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Slippery Slope, and False Dilemma, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 224.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,693 of 28,364 speakers). This Neate-Clegg is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Neate-Clegg
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
36.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 52.6%52.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 38.2%38.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 33.5%33.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 0.5%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos