Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nazhat Shameem Khan results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 68.4% saturation with 35.579 hits. Analysis detected 91.579 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,497 of 28,364 speakers). This Nazhat Shameem Khan is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Nazhat Shameem Khan
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
47.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 68.4%68.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.8%36.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 68.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos