Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nazanin Boniadi results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Straw Man, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.7% saturation with 63.375 hits. Analysis detected 477.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,067 of 28,364 speakers). This Nazanin Boniadi is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Nazanin Boniadi
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
39.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 65.3%65.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 65.3%65.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.7%58.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 41.3%41.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 65.3%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Speaker 65.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos