Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos94 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Police Agency results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 73.4% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 94 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,174 of 28,364 speakers). This National Police Agency is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
National Police Agency
Speaker details
Total words: 94
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.6% percentile
43.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos94 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 73.4%73.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.4%39.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos