Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video60.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Institute on Aging results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 71.4% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 60.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,727 of 28,364 speakers). This National Institute on Aging is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
National Institute on Aging
Speaker details
Total words: 60.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos60.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 71.4%71.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 71.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos