Speaker summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos100.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Homelessness Law Center results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 478.898 faulty-reasoning hits from 100.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 65.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,422 of 28,364 speakers). This National Homelessness Law Center is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
National Homelessness Law Center
Speaker details
Total words: 100.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.4% percentile
65.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos100.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 63.1%63.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 43.5%43.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 63.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos