Speaker summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Nelson results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Optimism Bias , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 53.25 hits . Analysis detected 380.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.2% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,366 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Nelson is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Nathan Nelson
Speaker details
Total words: 148
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.7% percentile 16.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos148 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 26.1% 26.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 26.1% 26.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 22.5% 22.5% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 18.2% 18.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 32.0% 32.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 6.7% Middle Ground: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst