Speaker summary
53% 7 analyzed articles/videos 497.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Hochman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 191 hits . Analysis detected 1,681.657 faulty-reasoning hits from 497.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,929 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Hochman is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. Nathan Hochman
Speaker details
Total words: 497.667
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.1% percentile 10.3% BS Score7 analyzed videos497.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Middle Ground: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst