Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos95.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Soares results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 65.2% saturation with 62.42 hits. Analysis detected 324.772 faulty-reasoning hits from 95.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 36.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,849 of 28,364 speakers). This Nate Soares is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Nate Soares
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 95.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
36.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos95.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 65.3%65.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 59.5%59.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.5%25.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Slippery Slope: Speaker 65.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos