Speaker summary
55%5 analyzed articles/videos2,764.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Blouin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 295.856 hits. Analysis detected 3,953.318 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,764.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,070 of 28,364 speakers). This Nate Blouin is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Nate Blouin
Speaker details
Total words: 2,764.333
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate