Speaker summary
55% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,764.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Blouin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 295.856 hits . Analysis detected 3,953.318 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,764.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,070 of 28,364 speakers). This Nate Blouin is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Nate Blouin
Speaker details
Total words: 2,764.333
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst