Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Voisin results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Slippery Slope, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,493 of 28,364 speakers). This Natalie Voisin is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Natalie Voisin
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos