Speaker summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos55.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Nakase results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 26.873 hits. Analysis detected 52.873 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,812 of 28,364 speakers). This Natalie Nakase is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Natalie Nakase
Speaker details
Total words: 55.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos55.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 48.4%48.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos